The source record for A Desk-Book of Errors in English Including Notes on Colloquialisms and Slang to be Avoided in Conversation — Themes and Context measures this digital text at 56,403 words, 4 hr 6 min estimated reading time, and 8 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 18.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English language -- Errors of usage,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 237 minutes
Language Study
54,336 recorded words. 9 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #62598About 264 minutes
Language Study
60,655 recorded words. 18 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #48486About 210 minutes
Language Study
48,164 recorded words. 36 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #48441Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 93 public books, 93 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
Frank H. Vizetelly's A Desk-Book of Errors in English (1920 revised edition) is a prescriptive usage guide that targets the colloquial inelegancies and vulgarisms he saw invading polite speech. The entries, arranged alphabetically, blend etymology, grammatical correction, and social judgment. For instance, under 'jewels, jewelry' he insists the two are not interchangeable: jewels are personal adornments, jewelry the trade stock. Such distinctions reveal his method of anchoring usage in precise definitions rather than mere preference.
Vizetelly's entries often carry a tone of moral urgency. Under 'jaw' he declares that expressions like 'Hold your jaw' have 'no place in the vocabulary of persons of refinement.' The word 'jag' is dismissed as a euphemism for 'drunk' and 'a term to be avoided in polite society.' This coupling of linguistic error with social class is consistent: slang and vulgarisms are not merely incorrect but markers of low breeding. The preface frames the book as a defense against 'illiterate communications' that 'corrupt good grammar,' a battle waged in the home and schoolroom.
Vizetelly frequently appeals to a word's root meaning to condemn common usage. Under 'journal' he notes that the French origin means 'daily,' so phrases like 'daily journal' or 'weekly journal' are 'violent catachresis.' He recommends 'daily newspaper' or 'weekly magazine' instead. Similarly, 'join issue' is distinguished from 'take issue' by legal history: to join issue is to admit the right of denial, not to agree. These etymological arguments give his corrections an air of objective authority, even when usage had already shifted.
The book catalogues slang with a mixture of disapproval and lexicographic curiosity. 'Ivories' for piano keys is labeled 'a slang term,' and 'tickle the ivories' a 'coarse way' of expressing piano playing. 'Jollier' and 'jolly, to' are identified as slang of 'widespread usage,' while 'josh' is a 'vulgarism' best replaced by 'chaff' or 'banter.' Vizetelly does not merely list these terms; he assigns them a social rank, often contrasting them with 'more refined' alternatives. The effect is a taxonomy of linguistic respectability.
Vizetelly devotes careful attention to ambiguous pronoun reference, a problem he calls a 'stumbling-block' for inexperienced writers. He critiques a sentence using 'it' and 'its' where the antecedent is unclear, recommending replacement with 'such repeal be.' The entry under 'it' warns against referring to 'any one of several words or clauses preceding, or perhaps to some idea merely implied.' This focus on syntactic precision reflects his broader concern that language should be unambiguous—a principle that underpins many of his corrections throughout the book.
Readers should approach this desk-book as a historical document of early twentieth-century prescriptivism. Vizetelly's judgments—on 'jiggered' as a minced oath or 'jar' as a misuse for 'disconcert'—reveal the social anxieties behind language regulation. The entries reward browsing, offering a snapshot of what one editor considered the border between correct and corrupt English.
Sometimes I shelve A Desk-Book of Errors in English and think how Vizetelly, for all his fussing over words, would have admired the way Yeats made language sing. That Index of the Project Gutenberg Works of William Butler Yeats — Context and Discussion feels like a quiet ledger of a different sort—not corrections, but careful orbits around a lifelong craft. Two keepers of the word, each in their own room.
Create a short personal record of your experience with this book.
