A glossary of Tudor and Stuart words, especially from the dramatists — Reading Notes
Edition facts
For A glossary of Tudor and Stuart words, especially from the dramatists — Reading Notes, the stored edition analysis reports 213,625 words, 15 hr 29 min estimated reading time, and 36 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 8.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “English language -- Obsolete words,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
uty to do in preparing his friend’s work for publication. In the first place he did not think that it fell within his province to make any considerable addition to the Word-list. The Vocabulary remains much as Professor Skeat left it. But it was found necessary, in going over the work, to make additions in many articles, in order to explain the history of the word, or to illustrate its meaning; connecting links had to be supplied, where the meanings of a word apparently had no connexion with one another. In this part of the work the Editor found great help in the New English Dictionary; and it will be seen that there is hardly a page of this book on which there does not occur the significant abbreviation (NED.). With the same help the definitions have been revised, and in many cases made more definite and explicit in order to explain the passage referred to. Professor Skeat’s plan was to give, as a rule, only references; it has been thought advisable to add many quotations, especially in cases where a quotation appeared necessary to illustrate a rare meaning of a word. In order to secure uniformity in arrangement many of the articles had to be re-written. For the illustrative matter, outside the literary English of the Tudor and Stuart period; the comparison of Tudor and Stuart words with provincial words found in the English Dialect Dictionary (EDD.); the exact references to earlier English—Middle English (ME.) and Old English (OE.); as well as the citation of cognate foreign forms, the Editor is responsible. In giving this additional matter he believes that he would have had the cordial approval of Professor Skeat, and hopes that he has added to the usefulness of the book.
If I may be allowed I would end on a personal note. I have thought it a great privilege to have been invited to complete the work of one held in such honour and esteem as Professor Skeat. And it has been a great pleasure to do something which might show, however inadequately, my gratitude for a friendship of nearly forty years. I wish the work that has been done on his book had been better done; I wish that it could have been undertaken by some one better equipped for the task, by one who had a more intimate acquaintance with the literature of the period dealt with. I hope that the imperfections of the book as it leaves my hands will be treated leniently. No one can be more conscious of them than he who is now bidding farewell to the task.
I have been fortunate in obtaining the help of two scholars who are masters of their subjects. My friend of many years, Dr. Henry Bradley, one of the Editors of _The New English Dictionary_, has taken an interest in the work from the first, which has been most encouraging. His views of what had to be done with the material I found, after I had made some progress in my task, coincided with those I had independently formed. He has most kindly read the proof-sheets throughout, and has made many valuable suggestions which I have gladly adopted. Mr. Percy Simpson, who has made a special study of the dramatists of the period treated, and particularly of Ben Jonson, has also kindly read the proof-sheets, and from his familiarity with the textual criticism of these authors has been able to correct some errors in the texts cited. I cannot conclude without expressing my thanks to the ‘reader’ for the accuracy with which the proof-sheets represented the MS., as well as for his judicious and conscientious use of the blue pencil.
A. L. MAYHEW. OXFORD, _Dec. 9, 1913_.
BOOKS REFERRED TO IN THIS WORK
Aasen, Ivar; Norsk Ordbog, 1873.
Alphita, a Medico-Botanical Glossary, ed. J. L. G. Mowat (Anecdota Oxoniensia, 1887).
Aneren Riwle, c. 1230; ed. J. Morton (Camden Soc., 1873).
Anglo-Saxon Gospels, ed. W. W. Skeat. The Gospels in West-Saxon, Northumbrian and Mercian Versions, 1871-87.
Ascham, Roger; Toxophilus, 1545, ed. Arber, 1868.
Awdeley, John; Fraternitye of Vacabondes, 1565, ed. E. Viles and F. J. Furnivall (EETS., extra series, 1869).
Aydelotte, F.; Elizabethan Rogues and Vagabonds (Oxford Historical and Literary Studies, vol. 1, 1913).
Babee’s Book, 15th cent.; ed. F. J. Furnivall (EETS., 1868).
Bacon, Francis; Essays, 1597, ed. W. Aldis Wright, 1871. Life of Henry VII, 1621, ed. J. R. Lumby, 1876.
Baldwyne, William; chief editor of the Mirrour for Magistrates, first issued in 1559.
Ballads. English and Scottish Popular Ballads, ed. from the Collection of F. J. Child by H. C. Sargent and G. L. Kittredge, 1904.
Barbour’s Bruce, 1375; ed. W. W. Skeat (EETS., 1870-7).
Barclay, Alexander; Ship of Fools, 1508, a translation of Sebastian Brandt’s _Narrenschiff_, c. 1494 (_Navis Stultifera_, 1488); ed. Jamieson, 1874.
Bardsley, Charles W.; English Surnames, 1875.
Baret, John; Alvearie or Quadruple Dictionary, 1580.
The glossary opens with an anecdote: Skeat, when asked about recreation, replied that he amused himself by reading old plays, pencil in hand, noting any word that might trouble a general reader. This origin story shapes the work’s character—it is a scholar’s casual harvest, not a systematic lexicon. The entries are terse, often a single line: a word, a source, a short definition, and sometimes a brief etymology. For instance, leer (empty) is illustrated with Ben Jonson’s Bartholomew Fair and traced to Old English lǣre. The glossary does not aim for completeness; it reflects what one attentive reader found striking.
From Play to Page: The Collector’s Method
The preface reveals that Skeat’s method was personal and unsystematic. He read for pleasure, yet his pencil was always active. The resulting slips—nearly 7,000—were arranged alphabetically but not intended as a comprehensive dictionary. The editor, Mayhew, notes that Skeat planned a small book with few quotations, mostly explanations and references. This explains the glossary’s brevity: entries like legem pone (ready money) get a longer note on its origin from the Psalms, while others are stark. The work is a record of one scholar’s encounters, not a definitive reference.
Etymology as a Window
Many entries include brief etymologies, often tracing words to Old English or Old French. For example, leme (a flame) is linked to OE lēoma, and lefull (permissible) to ME leveful. These etymologies are not exhaustive but offer a quick sense of a word’s lineage. The glossary also notes provincial usage, as with leer (empty), which is marked as common in dialect. This dual focus—on literary and spoken forms—gives the work a texture beyond a simple word list.
The Dramatists’ Vocabulary in Focus
The subtitle promises words “especially from the dramatists,” and the entries bear this out. Shakespeare appears frequently: leese (to lose) from Sonnet 5, leg in the phrase “to make a leg” from The Tempest. Ben Jonson is another key source, with leer (empty) from Bartholomew Fair and lembic (alembic) from The Alchemist. The glossary also draws on less canonical works like Skelton’s Colyn Cloute and Magnyfycence. This selection gives a sense of the range of language in early modern drama, from everyday terms to technical or obscure ones.
This glossary is best used as a companion while reading Tudor and Stuart plays, not as a standalone reference. Its entries are quick to consult, and the etymologies, though brief, often illuminate connections. Readers should note that the work is selective—it reflects Skeat’s interests and reading, not a complete record of the period’s vocabulary. For deeper study, Nares’ Glossary or the Oxford English Dictionary remain more comprehensive.
Flicking through Skeat’s glossary, I paused at scanted—a word meaning “grudged”—and felt the old itch to know how such sparseness was measured elsewhere. That led me, without quite knowing why, to How to Use the Popular Science Library; History of Science; General Index — Reading Notes. Both books feel like quiet keys to forgotten rooms, each index a whispered trail.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.